By 2g1c2 girls 1 cup

Around Osceola Untitled Document
Home Opinions Opinions Addressing voter fraud or causing it
Addressing voter fraud or causing it PDF Print E-mail
Opinions
Friday, 19 October 2012 08:17

Dockery_PaulaPaula Dockery
Florida senator

We enjoy many freedoms in America because “we the people” choose our leaders though open and fair elections. Previous generations have battled for the right to vote due to their race or gender. And the brave men and women of our military have put their lives on the line to protect these freedoms and rights.

An open, transparent and fair election is the bedrock of our political system. So any change to how elections are held should be considered with the utmost caution and always with the goal of ensuring every legitimate voter can access the polls with no barrier, delay or intimidation.

So it was troubling last year when a massive piece of legislation suddenly changed many procedures for voter registration and early voting in Florida. Then, as many of these changes were being challenged in the courts, the state began a questionable purge of “illegal” voters. As justification for these affronts to citizens’ rights, the state cited “voter fraud.”

Clearly, if fraud exists, the 67 locally elected supervisors of elections should aggressively address it, while ensuring that legitimate voters remain on the rolls and that their votes are counted. But first, the supervisors must confirm that fraud exists. Then, they should address it with a properly measured remedy. But this approach doesn’t describe recent history in Florida.

It all started in the spring of 2011 during the legislative session. A bill passed the Senate ethics and elections committee that addressed one issue: making it easier to put legislative-sponsored constitutional amendments on the ballot after the courts determine the language is misleading or confusing, by allowing the attorney general to simply make any needed changes.

After passing out of committee as a relatively small bill, this piece of legislation morphed into a 158-page bill filled with controversial changes, including reducing the number of early voting days from 14 to 6, and requiring the use of provisional ballots for voters who, as one example, want to note their new addresses at the polls.

The first opportunity many of us had to question this legislative train was on the floor of the Senate when it faced final passage. Where was the justification for making these changes? Where was the chance for meaningful debate? Why should we make it more difficult to register, change your address and vote?

While there was no credible evidence of fraud, nor any claim of fraudulent activity from the supervisors of election, the actions were defended with the noble-sounding cause of “preventing fraud.”

At the same time, Gov. Rick Scott produced a questionable list – two, in fact -- of potentially “illegal” voters. The larger list was quickly abandoned, but a purge list with roughly 2,000 names was sent to counties with the suggestion that these voters be removed from the rolls. After numerous people on the list, including several war heroes, stepped forward and proved their citizenship, the purge was temporarily halted.

Now, with less than four weeks to go to the 2012 presidential election, voter fraud has legitimately become a worrisome factor -- but not because of problems with early voting or any significant finding of illegally registered voters.

Suspicious voter registration forms began surfacing recently in Palm Beach County. Other counties similarly found discrepancies with duplicate forms, nonexistent people, or people with dual registration in other states. At last count, elections supervisors in at least 10 Florida counties are trying to determine how many new voters -- registered by a single company -- are legitimate. With time running out, how do supervisors ensure the integrity of their rolls?

Ironically the questionable firm was hired by the Republican Party of Florida for more than $1 million. It’s hard to argue you’re changing elections law to prevent fraud when your actions are directly responsible for it.

The integrity of our elections process depends on a fair and honest respect for the sanctity of our vote.

Changes to the process should be initiated by supervisors of elections, our experts in running elections, and not by political forces that see an opportunity to influence the outcome.

Paula Dockery is a term-limited Republican senator from Lakeland who is chronicling her final year in the Florida Senate. She can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

COMMENTS_LIST_HEADER  

 
+2 #4 Chriss 2013-05-19 15:21
"Changes to the process should be initiated by supervisors of elections, our experts in running elections, and not by political forces that see an opportunity to influence the outcome".

Well that's a great sentiment but in our county it’s the Supervisor of Elections that is doing this. But I agree with the rest.

Vote NO! on the Non-Partisan election question.
 
 
+4 #3 Keith 2013-05-19 15:21
If you signed the petition circulated by Mike Horner and the Chamber it said in the detailed wording how the winner of the election would be decided.

I assume you read the petition? If not, I suggest voters contact the Supervisor of Elections office to read what the wording says before deciding whether to vote YES or NO.

This has nothing to do with living in Polk or Osceola but EVERYTHING to do with voters making informed decisions?
 
 
-8 #2 Gunnydan 2013-05-19 15:21
Keith - I remind you once again that you are a POLK COUNTY RESIDENT. You have nothing to do with Osceola County other than you live on the other side of the line in Poinciana. Your assessment of the Non Partisan issue is incorrect. If you want a say in how we do things buy a house in Osceola County, Register To Vote in Osceola County and Vote. You are wrong period!
 
 
+5 #1 Keith 2013-05-19 15:21
Paula's comments are on target. There is also an item on this year's election ballot that voters do get to cast a vote on that deals with this topic.

The Non-Partisan County Commission question sounds straight forward on the ballot. Who would not want to get rid of partisanship?

The devil is in the details. The law if passed would allow the winner of County Commission races to be declared if a single candidate wins a majority of the primary ballots cast. 84% of Osceola voters do not vote in primaries. A 'YES' vote would deny these voters the right to vote for their future county commissioners.

More of the same as what Paula is describing? This is an issue the voters get to decide.

Vote NO! on the Non-Partisan election question.
 

Please register
or log in to post comments.

 

 

Question of the Week

What grade would you currently give the Obama Administration?
 

Calendar of Events

<<  May 2013  >>
 Su  Mo  Tu  We  Th  Fr  Sa 
   
 



 

 

Osceola News-Gazette
108 Church Street, Kissimmee, Florida 34741
407-846-7600
© 2013 aroundosceola.com
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.